[shortcode1]
Wronful Interference With Contractual Relations In Arizona
Intentional and tortious interference with contracts can be a trick issue in Arizona. The courts will often look to restatement second of torts section 767 to see if the conduct was “improper.” There are several factors the court may look to in determining if the action constitutes fair competition or tortious conduct for which the actor may be legally liable for the Plaintiff’s damages. Attorney Steve gives a general legal overview. This is not legal advice and should not be a substitute for retaining a business lawyer to review your case.
[ne_semantic_video video_id=”KZrpP5sPhM0″ title=”Wronful Interference With Contractual Relations In Arizona” upload_time=”2013-11-05T01:50:26.000Z” description=” Intentional and tortious interference with contracts can be a trick issue in Arizona. The courts will often look to restatement second of torts section 767″ duration=”PT5M20S”]
[shortcode2]
I had a city municipality use a 30 year old criminal record to interfere with a contract with a rideshare company. the offense was a non violent, property offense and had nothing to do with the job position.